Your customer visit was not validated
Keep the receipt and any evidence that you registered the vehicle. Ask the business to confirm your visit or request cancellation, while still meeting Horizon's appeal deadline. Single Code, Appeals Charter
Read whether Horizon alleges an overstay, non-payment or failure to register your vehicle. A purchase receipt and a parking payment prove different things; match your evidence to the allegation. Horizon charge details
Use the points that match what happened and attach evidence. These are grounds to investigate, not a promise that an appeal will be accepted.
Keep the receipt and any evidence that you registered the vehicle. Ask the business to confirm your visit or request cancellation, while still meeting Horizon's appeal deadline. Single Code, Appeals Charter
Supply the payment or validation record and the number entered. Identify the error and ask Horizon to apply the keying-error provisions. Single Code, Annex F
In England and Wales, check Schedule 4 conditions. If no windscreen notice was issued, the postal notice must be delivered within 14 days for keeper liability. That issue is separate from what the driver owes. Schedule 4, paragraph 9
Photograph the restriction at the entrance and near your bay. Compare the allowed stay with the recorded times and check any applicable grace period; explain the particular mismatch. Single Code, consideration and grace periods
Horizon Parking · 2024/25 · 2,668 assessor decisions.
12.9%
Allowed appeals divided by allowed plus refused appeals. Withdrawals are excluded.
343 allowed / 2,668 decided.
≤ 45.0%
Allowed appeals plus all not-contested cases, divided by decided plus not-contested cases. This is a ceiling, not the measured favourable share: some withdrawals are by drivers, not operators.
(343 allowed + 1,559 combined withdrawals) / 4,227 completed.
The appendix does not split operator and driver withdrawals for each operator. The exact share including only operator withdrawals cannot be calculated. Do not treat all not-contested cases as cancellations or apply the service-wide withdrawal split to an operator.
These are historical POPLA second-stage cases, not first-stage appeal outcomes or a forecast for your charge. Read the current route above; a change of association does not turn POPLA figures into IAS figures.
POPLA 2025 Annual Report Appendix, p. 10 POPLA 2025 Annual Report Appendix, p. 16
Compare all operators and read the definitionsIgnoring a private charge can cost you the appeal deadline and early-payment discount. The operator may pursue the debt, including through court. A debt collection letter is not itself a court judgment. If a claim arrives, respond by the deadline: failure to respond can lead to a judgment. A judgment normally stays on the register for six years, but paying it in full within one month removes it. GOV.UK: county court judgments
Yes, ask it to confirm your customer visit or request cancellation. Also submit your Horizon appeal on time unless you already have written confirmation that the charge is cancelled. Source
Use Horizon's notice portal with the charge reference and vehicle registration. Save the charge details and any evidence displayed before preparing your appeal. Source
First appeal to Horizon. If it rejects the appeal, use the POPLA code from the rejection and meet the second-stage deadline. Source
Start with a free grounds check. A first-stage appeal letter costs £4.99; you review it and submit it yourself.
Current appeal route: First appeal to the operator, then POPLA. Checked 2026-10-08 against the official AOS lists.
Check your notice and rejection letter for the route applicable to your charge.
Figures on this page describe historical POPLA reporting; they do not establish the current appeal route.
Private parking only. Confirm the issuer and appeal stage before using this profile.
This is not my type of noticeObserved outcome profile
Horizon Parking Ltd
Observed POPLA outcomes among second-stage appeals submitted in the reporting period.
Stage before figures
This page does not describe the operator’s first-stage acceptance rate. It covers only published second-stage reporting.
AOP₂ adjudicated
12.9%
Allowed 343 of n=2,668 decided.
binomial model interval (iid assumption): 11.6%–14.2%.
AOP₃ closed-case favourable share
Not calculated
n=4,227 reported closures, but the operator/appellant withdrawal split is not published per operator.
Operator-withdrawal rate
Not available
POPLA reports 1,559 combined not-contested cases for this entity; the withdrawing party is not identified.
Closed-case decomposition: allowed represents 8.1% of reported closures. The remaining not-contested cases cannot be separated by withdrawing party at operator level.
Descriptive scale measure
ADR submissions per 1,000 KADOE requests over a fully overlapping window.
Per 1,000 KADOE requests
Not available
No registered-keeper request figures are matched to this operator, so this ratio is not calculated.
| Numerator period | — | Denominator period | — |
|---|---|---|---|
| Window overlap | — | Comparability | — |
| Lag assumption | — | Issued kind | — |
Years are rows
| Reporting period | AOP₂ adjudicated | Allowed | Refused | Combined not-contested | AOP₄ / 1,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023/24 | 12.5% (n=2,024) | 252 | 1,772 | 1,194 | — |
| 2024/25 | 12.9% (n=2,668) | 343 | 2,325 | 1,559 | — |
No predictive series is produced: only two comparable reporting periods are present. Regime exposure is shown rather than silently treating periods as identical.
Outcome facts are calculated from the POPLA 2025 Annual Report Appendix (2024/25). KADOE request counts come from DVLA’s quarterly data-sharing release under the Open Government Licence.
Source note: source report submitted table mismatch; entity rows retained as printed. No part of the source-level unallocated submitted total is assigned to this entity.
This profile is independent and is not affiliated with Horizon Parking Ltd, POPLA, DVLA or a trade association.